NZCEL Level 4 AIS

This story implied that the captain is unjustified in his decision, which is the strongest should save; in comparison, the weakest have to sacrifice for the reasons everyone should treat equally, and uncertainty of everyone who has rescued will have a bright future than who to sacrifice. On the one hand, all men are created equal, everyone no matter who is weaker or stronger should have the right to live. The captain has no authority to make any life decisions for others. On the other hand, the captain thinks that the most influential person who has a good reputation in work filed or high status of society should save than the lower classes of society. The opponents say that the caption’s decision is inequitable because the potentials are limitless, the weaker can also have a promising and prosperous future through their efforts. However, the person who has an excellent job not mean a bright future. So the majority of people believe that the stronger should rescue are unequal.

The captain should be unjustified because he disregarded human equality. He sacrificed the weakest and saved strong people by his self-decision. As a result, some lives were survived. However, no one was treated equality, and some lives of weakest were taken for granted. They should have been treated with equality. Therefore, the captain should have decided by group judgment instead of his self-judgment. If they have done so, they would have been able to consider the best way to treat their lives equality. If they have made one decision by arguing together, they may have agreed with the solution. For these reasons, the captain can't be excused for treating human inequality, and he should have made a decision by group judgment.

The captain is justified in his decision to keep the strongest and sacrifice the weakest for survive of some and uncertain situation. One reason is that they only have one lifeboat. This is not enough opportunity to rescue these 30 people. If he has enough lifeboat, he will definitely save these survivors. Therefore, he needs to decide rapidly in an urgent situation. Another reason is the uncertain situation. There is much unknown danger after they escape on the lifeboat such as storm, so he needs some stronger people to increase chances of escape. If it were not for these strong men, everyone would have died in the sea. Therefore, he is justified.

16, July 2019 In this story about the 30 people which only 7 of them could survive and the captain choose 7 strongest people. Most people support the captain's decision. Because of two reasons. First of all the captain's mission is making sure as more as possible people can leave this place and survive. So, Democracy, human rights and equality should all be put on the back burner, rather than waster alive for those kinds of quality.   Secondly, the captain uses his authority to make the decisions. Because of that in a special situation discuss is useless and waster time. In this situation, time is life. So a quick and authority decision is imortant. Just as the power of the government would be more concentrated in war. So this why have a number of people support that the captain is justice.

To decide which option is better in the situation that involves life is necessary to recognize the possibilities related to future expectations. The most energetic people have more chance to survive and also can support vulnerable people to look after themselves. For instance, in situations such as shipwreck, most active people can hunt and provide food to the weakest. Therefore, the captain justified in his decision to keep the strongest and sacrifice the weakest for two reasons: strong people has more chance to survive, and besides, they can provide resources to help fragile people to sustain themselves.

Nowadays, most people learn academic study in formal school, but others are thinking work experiences in real life is better than formal education. I prefer that study is more useful with two reasons. Firstly, there is not a single way to learning formal education which study in a university, another kind of formal education centre is professional college where has a narrow range of subjects related to a particular career. Students are able to gain the useful knowledge with repeating training that they could holding strong skills to seeking a job. On the other hands, a student who has been training with formal education is more attract to company than a zero-based person who wants to be learning within working. Based of this idea, we can tell that people has limited time and energy and specializing study could saving time and makes them stand out in a crowd easier.